Re: [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL
| From: | Ralf Lang | Date: | Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:12:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] discussions, about a 5.3 EOL | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-58496@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Am 02.03.2012 15:15, schrieb Sebastian Bergmann:
On 03/02/2012 08:34 AM, Simon Schick wrote:I don't think php development should commit to unpaid long term support. -- Ralf Lang Linux Consultant / Developer Tel.: +49-170-6381563 Mail: lang@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537It's really hard to make a decision here because you also have to care about big companies in one way, that have not updated to PHP 5.3 nowSuch companies are using LTS releases of their OS distribution (RHEL, SLES, ...) where the vendor will take care of backporting PHP fixes. SLES 11 SP2 got out this week, finally shipping PHP 5.3 for the first time. They did a pretty good job maintaining their 5.2 product (which is still included as an unsupported option). Enterprise distributions are both slow and stable.