Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator
| From: | Rafael Dohms | Date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:23:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-61396@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Does this seem like a possible improvement we can work on? Anyone
>> interested in championing the change?
>>
>
> I like it in principle. My only concern is *why* wasn't it done this way
> in the first place... Is there a reason?
>
>
I don't recall correctly, there was a thread on this by David Coalier some
time ago, but it went completely off course and i remember BC breaks were
part of the reason. I think we have a good plan for BC breaks now, so why
not rethink this.
> Anthony
>
>
--
Rafael Dohms
PHP Evangelist and Community Leader
http://www.rafaeldohms.com.br
http://www.phpsp.org.br