Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator

From: Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 05:31:24 +0000
Subject: Re: Implicit isset in ternary operator
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-61640@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Use functions. I understood your post; I was replying to Yahav. Anyway, I don't agree with you that (built-in) functions are all we can add because there'll be too much debate. Other languages still consider adding operators over time and/or allow overloading. Getting functions added to the language is far from easy anyway. And IMO there are waaaaaay too many places where something bound closely to the variable like $?a would be instantly useful and portable; adding functions for each of these would be impossible. -- S.

« previous php.internals (#61640) next »