Re: [RFC] Propety Accessors v1.1

> What concerns me with the current implementation is that it leaks many > implementation details, in particular the fact that the accessors are > implemented as *real* __getXYZ methods and automatic implementations > also use *real* $__XYZ properties. Further to this, take the following example. public $_state { set { ... } } This automatically generates a "hidden" function __set_state(), which is a magic method already (and should be declared static, and take an array as it's only parameter) Another fine example of how automatically generating *real* implementations can potentially break things.