Re: Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision
| From: | Ralf Lang | Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:07:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-64831@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Just a thought - if the main argument is about syntax - we can
> propose few versions (Without implementing them) and then vote for
> 1) No annotations (attributes) at all. 2) Syntax #1 3) Syntax #2
> and so on.
>
> What do you think?
>
If we come up with two bad ideas, it's not a reason to shred
annotations altogether. ;)
Alternative wording:
1) Syntax #1
2) Syntax #2
...
n) Syntax #n
n+1) None of these - do nothing until we get better proposals.
- --
Ralf Lang
Linux Consultant / Developer
Tel.: +49-170-6381563
Mail: lang@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlDvSa8ACgkQCs1dsHJ/X7Ct/ACgx2PD/Pk4DDnFGC8QSq75K2J/
8i8An0IXRxebk3663Y1rZaoZN+Fr5m6b
=k2Bt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----