Re: Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision
| From: | Yahav Gindi Bar | Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:18:47 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Was Reflection annotations reader - We Need A Vision | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-64833@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Agree, I thought about Those who don't want to annotations at all. So we can add 2 extra
options for those who don't want annotations at all and those who wish better proposal :)
PS : I'm with those who do wish annotations.
ב-11 בינו 2013, בשעה 01:07, Ralf Lang <lang@b1-systems.de> כתב/ה:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>>
>> Just a thought - if the main argument is about syntax - we can
>> propose few versions (Without implementing them) and then vote for
>> 1) No annotations (attributes) at all. 2) Syntax #1 3) Syntax #2
>> and so on.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> If we come up with two bad ideas, it's not a reason to shred
> annotations altogether. ;)
>
> Alternative wording:
>
> 1) Syntax #1
> 2) Syntax #2
> ...
> n) Syntax #n
> n+1) None of these - do nothing until we get better proposals.
>
> - --
> Ralf Lang
> Linux Consultant / Developer
> Tel.: +49-170-6381563
> Mail: lang@b1-systems.de
> B1 Systems GmbH
> Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
> GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDvSa8ACgkQCs1dsHJ/X7Ct/ACgx2PD/Pk4DDnFGC8QSq75K2J/
> 8i8An0IXRxebk3663Y1rZaoZN+Fr5m6b
> =k2Bt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>