Re: [VOTE] Property Accessors for 5.5

> For those that have voted against this proposal, are there any > clarifications that can be made or questions answered? I can say that this bit is particularly confusing: public $foo {} My understanding that this code will not emit any warnings when interpreted, but the $foo property has no getter nor setter. You can call isset which will return false but unset will emit a warning, yes? I would think that the above snippet would create a property with all public, default implementations. I see why it doesn't: it doesn't permit you to declare only a getter and no setter. This is just one more reason for me to vote no on this.