Re: [VOTE] Property Accessors for 5.5

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote: > The simple explanation from me is that the ROI isn't there on this one. > It adds a lot of code complexity for very little return. Yes, it saves a > couple of lines of boilerplate code for a few people, but the cost is > high in terms of ongoing maintenance and potential issues for opcode > caches as well. If you look at the split in voting you will notice it is > pretty much split along the lines of the people who have to maintain > this code vs. the people who would like a shiny new feature. > I did a bit of testing with APC today and here is what I came up with: https://gist.github.com/4597660 It adds the logic for copying the accessor functions in my_copy_property_info*. This seemed to do the trick in my testing, but I don't really know APC, so I can't judge whether it might require further changes. Thanks, Nikita