Re: Core extension versions
| From: | Michael Wallner | Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:19:58 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Core extension versions | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-69565@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 15 October 2013 17:16, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as part of the extension version check on PECL it turned out, that the
> extensions in the core are almost completely out of track with their
> versions, not even to talk about version macros names. That regards to
> exts imported from PECL as well as to the exts never been in PECL. Here
> are a few examples of zend_module_entry version strings:
>
> ext/simplexml
> "0.1"
>
> ext/bz2
> NO_VERSION_YET (== NULL) but was PECL 1.0 in 2003
>
> ext/pdo
> "1.0.4dev" whereby it was PECL 1.0.3 in 2006
>
> and the winner might be that from ext/tokenizer
>
> "0.1", /* Replace with version number for your extension */
>
> as if it were just generated :)
>
> Only a few extensions, just to name some - zip, dom, oci8, track the
> version number.
>
> Actually that doesn't look solid for the extensions being in the core
> for years. And while that's a minor issue, it doesn't really smell good.
> So, do we wanna do something about it?
>
I'd use PHP_VERSION for those extensions not explicitely managing a version.
--
Regards,
Mike