Re: Core extension versions

On 15 October 2013 18:33, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 15, 2013 6:13 PM, "Christopher Jones" <christopher.jones@oracle.com> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/15/13 8:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 15 October 2013 17:16, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> as part of the extension version check on PECL it turned out, that the >>>>> extensions in the core are almost completely out of track with their >>>>> versions, not even to talk about version macros names. That regards to >>>>> exts imported from PECL as well as to the exts never been in PECL. Here >>>>> are a few examples of zend_module_entry version strings: >>>>> >> >>>> >>>> I'd use PHP_VERSION for those extensions not explicitely managing a > version. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> PHP_VERSION-bundle >>> >>> for clarity in bug report :) >> >> >> >> For ext/* that do not (or no longer) have PECL releases (e.g. pdo, >> dom) I would change their versions to PHP_VERSION-bundle even if they >> currently have some rational versioning. >> >> Extensions like ext/oci8 that historically do also have PECL releases >> should manage their own version numbers > > Yes, that's the idea +1 -- Regards, Mike