Re: Core extension versions

Am 15.10.2013 18:12, schrieb Christopher Jones: > > > On 10/15/13 8:45 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: >>> On 15 October 2013 17:16, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as part of the extension version check on PECL it turned out, that the >>>> extensions in the core are almost completely out of track with their >>>> versions, not even to talk about version macros names. That regards to >>>> exts imported from PECL as well as to the exts never been in PECL. Here >>>> are a few examples of zend_module_entry version strings: >>>> > >>> >>> I'd use PHP_VERSION for those extensions not explicitely managing a >>> version. >> > >> >> PHP_VERSION-bundle >> >> for clarity in bug report :) > > > For ext/* that do not (or no longer) have PECL releases (e.g. pdo, > dom) I would change their versions to PHP_VERSION-bundle even if they > currently have some rational versioning. > > Extensions like ext/oci8 that historically do also have PECL releases > should manage their own version numbers What about pecl extensions with version numbers grater than PHP_VERSION on moving/moved to core? Don't know if this is the case somewhere. Marc