Re: [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers
| From: | Bob Weinand | Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:01:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-69758@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Am 22.10.2013 um 12:54 schrieb "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:derick@php.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 12:12 PM
>> To: Bob Weinand
>> Cc: Developers Mailing List PHP
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers
>>
>>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Bob Weinand wrote:
>>>
>>> I have started the vote for extended keyword support RFC:
>>>
>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/keywords_as_identifiers
>>
>> Just to explain why I voted "no". I think the idea is good, but what I
> see from
>> the patch is that it adds a *lot* of hand written state machines which
> are
>> going to be a pain to maintain. I do not think this extra maintenance is
> worth
>> the features - we've done pretty well without it.
>
> Thumbs up for the idea as well, but I don't think we can live with the
> implementation. BTW, that's a bit of a grey area but I think that even if
> an idea is accepted, if there's no reasonably clean implementation
> available for it, I don't think it can go in.
>
> Zeev
As said, if anyone has a good idea how to improve the implementation, I'd be happy to implement
it.
(I really can't imagine a better way...)
Bob Weinand
(Btw. Is my implementation so bad? I think it looks far worse than it is in reality...)