Re: [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers
| From: | Kevin Ingwersen | Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:35:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Vote] Keywords as identifiers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-69845@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello there! I just recently joined the mailing list - what is this vote about?
Kind regards, Kevin Ingwersen
Am 24.10.2013 um 15:37 schrieb Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Thumbs up for the idea as well, but I don't think we can live with the
>>>> implementation. BTW, that's a bit of a grey area but I think that
>>>> even if an idea is accepted, if there's no reasonably clean
>>>> implementation available for it, I don't think it can go in.
>>>>
>>>> Zeev
>>>
>>> As said, if anyone has a good idea how to improve the implementation,
>> I'd
>>> be happy to implement it.
>>>
>>> (I really can't imagine a better way...)
>>
>> I think the point that Derick is trying to make, and that I agree with -
>> is that if there's no better way to implement it we shouldn't be
>> implementing it at all. In other words, coming up with a clean
>> implementation is a requirement before we can go ahead and introduce this
>> feature into the language. I did not mean to imply you did a poor job
>> implementing it, I don't presently have an idea of how to make it better.
>>
>
> I'm all +1 with that.
>
> Don't forget that we have been leaving with those reserved keyword for ~15y
> now, and just right.
> I don't think we should hurry on such a feature adding so much complicated
> stuff, especially to the lexer.
>
> Julien.Pauli