Re: Re: [RFC] Slim POST data (was: PHP-5.6 and $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA)
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:52:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] Slim POST data (was: PHP-5.6 and $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70393@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2013.11.26. 1:03, "Ryan McCue" <lists@rotorised.com> ezt írta:
>
> Michael Wallner wrote:
> > On 23 November 2013 22:40, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> what do you think?
> >
> > Sounds doable! I'd implement the INI with 1, "On", 0, "Off", and
> > -1,
> > "Never" settings, if nobody objects (the first two for BC and "Never"
> > to complement).
> >
>
> I'd probably go with 2 rather than -1, just in case we want to turn it
> into a bitmask in the future (unsigned seems better than signed to me
> anyway).
>
> --
> Ryan McCue
>
I don't think there is any chance that we would want to turn it into a
bitmask, as the values are mutually exclusive.
And the ini should go away with the next major anyways.