Re: func_get_args BC break

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I agree that the change makes BC break for some tricky code :( > and i don't insist to keep it in 5.5. > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com > >wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Can we do anything to fix it? Is the problem limited only to > > pass-object-by-ref or also for other by-ref scenarios? In the latter > > case it does constitute a BC break I think and it may be a good idea to > > move it to 5.6... > > > > > Hi, as we agreed that this is a BC break, I don't think that it is a good idea even for 5.6. could we also create a test for this behavior, so we don't change this unintentionally later on? -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu