Re: [RFC] session_start(), read_only, lazy_write; Take 2

Hi, On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote: >> >> Btw, another argument in merging updateTimestamp() into write() is >> that userland implementations of it up until now have only been >> possible by altering write(), so at least some users should be more >> familiar with that approach. > > > Component only does its jobs with good implementation. > Session module consists of session manager, session save handler and session > serializer. > > Session manager should manage how it works. > Session save handler should save/retrieve session data only. > Session serializer should serialize/unserialize data only. > > It breaks this design with your suggestion. > So letting save handler do the manager's job is not good. IMO. I don't understand how that's breaking any kind of design. Could you elaborate? Cheers, Andrey.