Re: Proposal for license change

As I have said, if you really want to keep things the way it is, I'll just let,it go. But this is what you can do to come as close to GPL compatibility as possible. > On Apr 3, 2014, at 22:15, Stuart Dallas <stuart@3ft9.com> wrote: > >> On 3 Apr 2014, at 15:56, musicdenotation@gmail.com wrote: >> >> And since nobody owns PHP and it is intended to be truly open and accessible to all, does >> it even make sense to restrict use of the PHP name and require permission from an entity? >> In any case, may the US and UK trademark laws protect you. :) > > Why does this matter so much to you? Are you so desperate to call your product/project > "PHP Whatever" that you really can’t accept that the PHP licence is not an accident? > > As far as I know that clause exists to prevent any confusion over whether PHP (i.e. the > community) has had any input in to or has endorsed a particular product/project. It’s that simple. > And the only reason I can think of (which doesn’t in any way mean it’s the only reason that > exists) for why you care so much is that you want to imply such a connection. > > -Stuart > > -- > Stuart Dallas > 3ft9 Ltd > http://3ft9.com/ > > >>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 20:26, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/02/2014 06:54 PM, Kris Craig wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Sharon Levy <slevy1@pipeline.com> wrote: >>>>> Why does the PHP project continue to be without any kind of corporate >>>>> sponsorship in contrast to the opensource project Ubuntu which is backed by >>>>> Canonical? If the PHP project were to have a company supporting it, >>>>> wouldn't it be better protected? And, with a company backing it >>>>> wouldn't >>>>> the issue of acquiring a trademark then be feasible? >>> >>>> And if the company's shareholders decide they want PHP to go in a certain >>>> direction, what then? I'm not necessarily opposed to the idea. It just >>>> makes me really, really nervous. I'm not sure a trademark and funding >>>> would be worth giving-up our independence. >>> >>> Right, not being beholden to any sort of corporate entity is very much >>> on purpose. Nobody "owns" PHP and at the same time we all "own" >>> PHP. >>> That is the only way to keep PHP truly open and accessible to all, for >>> better or worse. >>> I also think you underestimate the hassle involved in getting (and >>> protecting) a Madrid-protocol international trademark for a 3-letter term. >>> >>> -Rasmus >>> >>> -- >>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> -- >> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >