Re: __clone() implementation

ZS>> Both are valid points, and they both sound like the same problem from ZS>> two different angles. I think that the best approach would be to ZS>> first do an implicit clone (i.e., 'dumb' copy of all of the ZS>> elements), and then call __clone(), even if it exists. It should ZS>> solve both cases. If we do this, there's no reason for __clone to have parameter - $this should already have all the data one may need, not? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.109