Re: RFC: Move phpng to master
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:54:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Move phpng to master | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76205@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Michael Wallner <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On 27 Jul 2014 09:26, "Kris Craig" <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Michael Wallner <
> mike.php.net@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27 Jul 2014 08:23, "Kris Craig" <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Here's my question to counter yours, Michael: What's the rush?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Every day php-ng is not GA, PHP is losing ground to its competitors.
> >
> > Umm, how? Do you have any data to support this? According to
> http://php.net/usage.php, as of 2012, PHP's usage is
> steadily increasing.
> As far as our competitors are concerned, well:
> >
> >
>
> http://w3techs.com/technologies/comparison/pl-java,pl-php,pl-ruby,pl-python
> >
> >
> > As you can see, PHP continues to dominate with over 80% market share and
> no signs-- at least, none that I can see-- that we are "losing ground" as
> you stated.
> >
>
> Surely it's wise to make the same wrong assumptions Microsoft did with
> Internet Explorer?
>
PHP is losing as a general scripting language for sure.
JavaScript is winning in this area even if it was originated as "a web
client scripting language".
http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
http://langpop.com/
We are better to consider this situation seriously. IMHO.
Focus on web as well as encourage general usage is what we need.
Making PHP a choice for "new" project should be one of the most important
objective.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net