Re: 64-bit integers and 64-bit string length patch is ready to be merged

On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:56, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > The original patch used the right naming based on the type used behind it. So IS_LONGLONG, then? > In any case, the patch represents what the rfc and the discussions around > it say. I rather merge it asal and begin on the (long) list of todos for 7. > > If you like to propose new naming with the bigint rfc, please go ahead. > Time is also an issue as ppl are beginning to migrate their extensions to > test. Changing them again takes time. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t changing the name again just be a simple matter of global find/replace? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/