Re: [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > On Sep 21, 2014 10:08 AM, "Xinchen Hui" <laruence@php.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: >> > >> >> On 21 Sep 2014, at 03:52, Xinchen Hui <laruence@php.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey: >> >> >> >> it should be closed tomorrow, not today. >> > >> > It's the 21st in my timezone. I started the vote at 2am on the 14th and >> > it's now 4am on the 21st. I don't see a problem. >> >> the problem is, you only get 16:8 on today. and it's weekend. >> >> that means your RFC is not very common acceptable. (I have strong >> objection on it). >> >> and it's weekend, so, it's better to wait one day more.. >> >> anyway, I see you already commit your patch... which is not very good. >> > > I did not manage to vote while being on the road. But I am +1. So consider > it as, theoretically, 17:8. why you didn't? there are lot's of people didn't vote. so how to count theirs vote? (please if you have opinion.. then vote) > > However the nitpicking about votes periods, % and co is getting annoying. I > will see if we can clarify that. To use all possible ways to block or push > RFCs is getting counter productive and produce a bad experience. and nervemind. I respect the RFC process, even I don't like this RFC thanks > > Cheers, > Pierre -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/