Re: [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics
| From: | Michael Wallner | Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:43:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77462@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 2014-09-22 14:08, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:06, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
>> I would also like to point out that, just like a 8:8 vote is not a
>> "50% majority", 16:8 is technically also not a two thirds
>> *majority*. The RFC, like with many other important things is of
>> course too vague on this.
The "+1" is only for 50% majorities.
>
> An 8:8 vote is not a majority, no, but a 9:8 would be a 50%+1
> majority.
>
> A 16:8 vote *is* a 2/3 majority.
Yes, I think so, too.
--
Regards,
Mike