Re: [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics

On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:06, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: > I would also like to point out that, just like a 8:8 vote is not a "50% > majority", 16:8 is technically also not a two thirds *majority*. The > RFC, like with many other important things is of course too vague on > this. An 8:8 vote is not a majority, no, but a 9:8 would be a 50%+1 majority. A 16:8 vote *is* a 2/3 majority. 2/3 of people have voted in favour, with 1/3 against. It’s a very narrow one, but so far I’m yet to see anyone say it should be 2/3+1 and not plain 2/3. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/