RE: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs?
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2014 19:09:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77554@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sep 23, 2014 8:17 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> I'd welcome better suggestions if anybody has any. I think the complete
> lack of metrics and exceptionally low barrier to voting is a much bigger
> problem.
>
Please point me at a vote where the author is not part of what you defined
(and the rfc):
- php karma (doc)
- lead of leading projects
Now to create classes along developers or regular contributors is the worst
idea we can have. It says that writing docs is less valuable than a PoC.
Wrong in so many ways.
> Perhaps LoC?
Oh gosh...
>
> That said, 20 commits is an exceptionally low bar IMHO to get a say for a
> project with a *HUGE* impact such as PHP.
And what's about zero commit in 5+ years?
This discussion has the bad taste of creating a kind of elite in php.net.