Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints

Hi, > On 9 Feb 2015, at 08:04, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > > this is more or less true. :( > The proposal is presented in an unfair way to include strict typing without > the ability to vote for weak types only. Oddly, nobody seems to complain that it's unfair if I side with the weak typing camp, despite that being equally unfair. > Despite of semantic arguments, the implementation is a bit immature and > introduces slowdown for any code without type hints. The implementation could do with improvement, this is true. However I suspect any slowdown is minor at best, and this could be dealt with in future. The RFC is more about the language change than the implementation. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/