Re: Basic STH - status & unofficial poll

On Mar 16, 2015 8:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact I > think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for > delivering STH in PHP 7.0. Whether or not it’s put to a vote will be up to > Bob. It is not up to any of us. If it is too late and as far as I remember it is, then it is over for any new rfc. > Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when the > Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which > according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails). If I see that > Basic STH is going to fail, I’ll change my vote to be in favor of the Dual > Mode STH RFC, call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive > mode RFC. Then do it now. Accept that your RFC failed and stop trying yet another move to get it. This is really killing us. > > This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here: wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hints > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zeev