Re: Basic STH - status & unofficial poll

I voted no just because at this point no matter which way STH goes, it will end bad so I would rather not have it until people reconcile on something that works for all parties. On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2015 8:03 AM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > > > > > First, I decided not to propose Basic STH under my name, despite the fact > I > > think that not committing to put it to a vote adds unneeded risk for > > delivering STH in PHP 7.0. Whether or not it’s put to a vote will be up > to > > Bob. > > It is not up to any of us. If it is too late and as far as I remember it > is, then it is over for any new rfc. > > > Secondly, I do want to attempt to understand what will happen if & when > the > > Basic STH RFC goes to a vote at some later point in the future (which > > according to Bob, will happen if the Dual Mode RFC fails). If I see that > > Basic STH is going to fail, I’ll change my vote to be in favor of the > Dual > > Mode STH RFC, call upon everyone to do the same, and retract my Coercive > > mode RFC. > > Then do it now. Accept that your RFC failed and stop trying yet another > move to get it. This is really killing us. > > > > > This unofficial-non-RFC poll is here: > wiki.php.net/notrfc/scalar_type_hints > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Zeev >