Re: Studlycaps and MySQLi

Hello John, Tuesday, March 23, 2004, 9:05:51 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 12:58, Georg Richter wrote: >> Sure, your book isn't ready yet. Would be interesting to know your opinion if >> it would be printed already. > Then I really wouldn't care. In either case, this entire thread is > getting completely pointless. I don't care if studlyCaps or > underscore_methods are used or not, I'd just like to see it be one or > the other. Since everyone seems to have a major problem changing SQLite > and MySQLi, perhaps for good reason -- what about just changing ext/tidy > back to underscore_methods? At least then we'd be consistent, and > probably wouldn't have as much of a negative impact as changing the > database extensions would. I already changed SQLite because as far as i know there were only two extensions left which didn't follow studlyCaps convention which we agreed upon twice so far - even though ppl pretend we hadn't. The only other extension i spotted so far not following studlyCaps is ming - and that at least doesn't use dashes and is still experimental. And to say it again, i bet only a handful of ppl are using mysqli's oo api right now but many ppl use things like __toString() already. Best regards, Marcus mailto:helly@php.net