Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:53:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90800@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Dan,
Dan Ackroyd wrote:
On 21 January 2016 at 07:06, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:This is true, but Ze'ev acknowledged that already. -- Andrea Faulds https://ajf.me/We have clear rules which disallow revival of RFCs which failed a vote for a duration of six months, unless they're very substantially modified, so revival isn't always allowed in open source.As other people have noted, the RFC never went to vote, so it was never rejected. But even if it had been, the actual text is you're claiming as a clear rule is: "it will not be allowed to bring up a rejected proposal up for another vote, unless...The author(s) make substantial changes to the proposal." There is absolutely no rule against being allowed to discuss something. The only rule is about putting stuff to a vote repeatedly.