Re: Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct
| From: | Alda Marteau-Hardi | Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2016 18:58:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] [Re-proposed] Adopt Code of Conduct | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-90839@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello everyone !
It's my first mail here and before writing anything else I'd like to
say that I'm thankful to Anthony and Derick for carrying this RFC.
Now… I have one issue with this argument :
Chase Peeler a écrit le 22/01/2016 19:15 :
> 3.) Finally, I think a Code of Conduct that includes punitive
> measures is a bad idea. I won't go into details on why, as we've
> gone over them in detail, but I'll sum it up as follows: a Code of
> Conduct that gives a small group of people the ability to punish
> others is open to abuse. I'm not saying that anyone proposing such
> a code of conduct has evil intentions, or even that anyone on this
> list would purposely act in an evil way if a member of the
> committee. In fact, the reason I feel such Codes of Conduct is
> dangerous is that someone acting in what they feel IS a noble way
> can easily do the opposite.
I think it falls in the « perfect solution » fallacy. We have the
current situation, which is already open to abuse (see the repeated
references towards « the toxicity of internals ») and because such
abuses can still happen with a Code of Conduct and the team in charge
of watching its application you consider that it is a bad idea.
Furthermore, the abuses that may be perpetuated by such a team are
already limited by the « Accountability » paragraph of the RFC :
« The PHP project voting body has the right to overturn any action
taken the Community Mediation Team by vote (50% + 1 required to
overturn). »
Respectfully yours,
- --
Alda Marteau-Hardi
XMPP: alda@leetchee.fr | Web: http://aldarone.fr/
GPG: 0xC2F8A5C7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWonvuAAoJEDKPoMbC+KXHeTQH/RdpxlejsT9tg3u42lrIvpQs
GiJ2nK8sTJvTfu2Mz6JGpFTwcIzFrw3h2xy8vRInuHHn8nx1mdDJL2lb1AhnlXjm
bB2rZCAjj/I6Z5+YiAehRqm2fHoye+qEu72Q4Temea8bQGwHmQZXtVG+NIbH+lU/
nFTEUfAodtDTUfowXbDj3qQGnvyLYnmH0Uzvl9oEK8AkUpAqRzKCyA88O9hBhCwy
Sy6Pqu1YC7O+7ZuTb7x5Y6FG0c9dMFMIzDsayPGhavyt95AQY/GdDqFnAZNZhQAE
73ktZTBNf9AKB/0BfJ3KbFiEP39iZiEEgOhrXa/k2aJoXzl8C7iLJh9Nli/Kh/s=
=OA7I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----