Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values

From: Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:36:22 +0000
Subject: Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-92876@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Am 28.04.2016 um 18:28 schrieb Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>: > > Hi, > > The BC break in PHP-7.0 was introduced by commit ee9a78a033696ff9546fb1dbfecd28f20477b511 > > Author: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> > Date: Mon Mar 28 11:54:25 2016 +0100 > > Late, there were few more commits that changed and moved the problematic code. > > Anatol, I think we should revert this before 7.0.6 release. > > Thanks. Dmitry. > > ________________________________________ > From: morrison.levi@gmail.com <morrison.levi@gmail.com> on behalf of Levi Morrison > <levim@php.net> > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 18:40 > To: internals > Cc: Dmitry Stogov; Tom Worster > Subject: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values > > I have discovered through a [bug report][1] a case where having > explicitly nullable parameters would be of value. > > <?php > > interface Foo { > public function bar(array $baz = null); > } > > class Hello implements Foo { > public function bar(array $baz = array()) {} > } > > ?> > > You can theoretically change the default value in a sub-type, but in > this case moving away from the default value of null breaks because > the subtype no longer permits null. It is important to realize that we > previously *allowed* this behavior since PHP 5.1 but was fixed in > 7.0.6. > > If instead we had nullable types separately from default values of > null this could change to: > > <?php > > class Hello implements Foo { > public function bar(array | null $baz = []) {} > } > > ?> > > (or a short-form ?array $baz = [] if short-form passes) > > This preserves the ability to be null but changes the default value. > Of course, there may be other code changes necessary to future-proof > their code but there current code would now work without having to > rewrite any method bodies (just signatures). > > In light of this I kindly request that RFCs that add nullable types > for only return values be withdrawn. So that [Union Types][2] and > [Nullable Types][3] can go forward unhindered. > > > [1]: https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=72119 > [2]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/union_types > [2]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullable_types Hey Dmitry, thanks for reverting… but I've seen you had merged just straight up? I assume this was unintentional (as it should definitely remain fixed in 7.1). Thus I've reverted your changes in master (only) and added an appropriate NEWS entry there. Thanks, Bob

« previous php.internals (#92876) next »