Re: Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values

Levi, I provided an implementation for your RFC on February 2015, and I would be glad if your RFC was accepted that time. Bit since that time you block it in respect to "Union Types" See conversation at PR https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1045 I would be also glad if your "Nullable Types" RFC was accepted now, but I don't trust in your intention to support it. ________________________________________ From: morrison.levi@gmail.com <morrison.levi@gmail.com> on behalf of Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 10:02:20 PM To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: Joe Watkins; internals; Tom Worster Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > Levi, I don't understand, why do you keep trying to own "Nullable Types" RFC, if > you like completely different "Union Types". I don't understand; I wrote the RFC. What do you mean, "keep trying to own" it? I wrote both Nullable Types and Union Types. Some view those RFC's as competing, but they can also be orthogonal. I see the value in having both.