Re: Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:02:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Request to withdraw RFC's for nullable types for only return values | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-92895@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Levi, I don't understand, why do you keep trying to own "Nullable Types" RFC, if
> you like completely different "Union Types".
I don't understand; I wrote the RFC. What do you mean, "keep trying to
own" it? I wrote both Nullable Types and Union Types. Some view those
RFC's as competing, but they can also be orthogonal. I see the value
in having both.