Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Union types

> Am 14.06.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Fleshgrinder <php@fleshgrinder.com>: > > On 6/14/2016 8:00 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> So we just held a vote on introducing ?type a month ago, to now vote on >> removing it. Am I the only one to whom it doesn't make a lot of sense? >> > > Exactly what I question too especially because the other vote was so > overwhelmingly positive. If we'd voted first on unions (and had a separate vote whether to allow null as type), I'm sure the vote would have been just as positive and the nullables RFC not appeared at all. I'm personally guessing that people mainly wanted to see nullability _at all_ rather than the specific "?" syntax. Thus there's a separate vote... Bob