Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Union types
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:43:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Union types | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93981@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 14 ביוני 2016, at 22:53, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net<mailto:levim@php.net>> wrote:
I'm personally against Union types because it makes no sense for classes
I've been over this before but I'll repeat it here for completeness:
this is not true.
There are more than enough constructs in PHP to handle all these use cases, and handle them nicely.
We don't need specialized constructs for every use case.
Either way, no point at redoing the discussion. Apologies if I triggered it, context was only the
vote.
Zeev