Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Union types
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2016 22:51:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Union types | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-93984@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> On 14 ביוני 2016, at 22:53, Levi Morrison <levim@php.net> wrote:
>
> I'm personally against Union types because it makes no sense for classes
>
>
> I've been over this before but I'll repeat it here for completeness:
> this is not true.
>
>
> There are more than enough constructs in PHP to handle all these use cases,
> and handle them nicely. We don't need specialized constructs for every use
> case.
To clarify here, you are saying we don't need unions because they are
a special case, yes? But you previously stated you are in favor of
special casing the language types such as numeric?
These are at odds.