Re: [PATCH] fix pcre global variable abuse

From: Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:11:51 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix pcre global variable abuse
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-9503@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
At 10:05 AM 4/23/2004 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
On April 23, 2004 10:01 am, Andi Gutmans wrote: I think changing back to malloc/free on RSHUTDOWN is a better solution. After all, we use our memory manager to prevent memory leaks and I think this is one of PHP's most important features. I don't trust third party extensions :) The php_pcre_(free|malloc) use persistent allocation routines with the persistent flag set. Iif I am reading the code correctly, this is nothing more then a wrapper around malloc() free() without any sort of ZE memory management. If that is indeed the case, it would seem that Joe's solution would be better, since besides fixing the problem it eliminates pointless wrapper.
I was sure it was using emalloc/efree. Is there any good reason it isn't? Does PCRE require persistent memory? If it does, then I agree with you that malloc/free is the right way to go. Andi

« previous php.internals (#9503) next »