Re: Improving mt_rand() seed
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2017 12:34:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Improving mt_rand() seed | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-97911@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 16.01.2017 at 08:04, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Since I was about to improve uniqid()'s entropy by replacing
> php_combined_lcg() to php_random_int(), I spent time to check other places
> that could be a problem.
>
> mt_rand()'s is seeded as follows by default.
>
> ext/standard/php_rand.h
> #ifdef PHP_WIN32
> #define GENERATE_SEED() (((zend_long) (time(0) * GetCurrentProcessId())) ^
> ((zend_long) (1000000.0 * php_combined_lcg())))
> #else
> #define GENERATE_SEED() (((zend_long) (time(0) * getpid())) ^ ((zend_long)
> (1000000.0 * php_combined_lcg())))
> #endif
>
> We know this kind of seed is guessable.
But where's the problem? mt_rand() is not suitable for cryptographic
purposes anyway.
> i.e. Our session id is compromised
> by this kind of code.
Does the session ID rely on mt_rand() or GENERATE_SEED()? If so, that
would of course be an issue, but that should be fixed by not using
mt_rand()/GENERATE_SEED() for the session ID at all, IMHO.
--
Christoph M. Becker