Re: [RFC][Discuss] Arrow Functions

Hi Ilija, On 7 February 2017 18:58:15 GMT+00:00, ilija.tovilo@me.com wrote: >And also, have you considered letting people vote for their preferred >arrow function syntax? >I kinda don’t think we’re gonna find an agreement as there are so many >different opinions. The problem with voting on alternative syntaxes is precisely that there *are* so many different options. Designing a vote with multiple options that gives an answer people are happy with is a whole science in itself. I think the best we can do is have a "without prejudice" vote on a single proposal - if it is declined, a new proposal can be made after a suitable period of reflection. This has already happened once with this very topic, this RFC having emerged from a previous one being rejected. That doesn't mean we can't discuss other syntaxes, but just opening up all possible options to a vote doesn't really help IMHO. Regards, -- Rowan Collins [IMSoP]