Re: cvs: pear-core / package2.xml

Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: >On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:25:34 +0200 >klaus@capitalfocus.org (Klaus Guenther) wrote: > > > >>On 8/16/2005 5:47 PM, Clay Loveless spake the following words: >> >> >>>From what I've >>>witnessed over the past year on this list and PEAR-DEV, Greg >>>Beaver is the *only* person who should be listed as a "lead" on >>>PEAR 1.4.0. Everyone else should be a developer at most, and >>>more likely helpers. >>> >>> >>The reason some of these people are still listed as lead is >>because they've got a say in how things continue to develop. And >>I think Pierre is there because he's responsible for php releases >>of pear. As long as he's in that role (and it's not an >>insignificant role, whatever you say), he should remain as a >>co-lead. Even if he doesn't do much work on the code itself. >> >> > >Not really only for that, and the fact that Greg wrote 1.4.0 does >not mean that any other should silent and give up. > agreed, many have provided crucial QA and reality checks on the concepts, even if there are minor to major disagreements. I do wonder what happened to Tomas though, and I wonder if it would be good to mark Stig as inactive in package2.xml? Greg