Re: cvs: pear /Net_Ping Ping.php package.xml
| From: | (Stig Sæther Bakken) | Date: | Tue, 22 May 2001 22:02:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: pear /Net_Ping Ping.php package.xml | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.cvs |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-cvs+get-175@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>]
> Martin Jansen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 22 May 2001 13:05:32 -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> >
> > >> > Isn't this in the pear repository, though? I thought the Experimental/
> > >> > dir was only in the php4/pear directory?
> > >>
> > >> Nope, there's /pear/experimental.
> > >
> > >I don't think there's much of a reason for an 'experimental'
> > >directory in the main pear/ repository. It makes sense in the
> > >php4/pear/ directory because that's what's used for PHP
> > >distributions, but the pear/ directory should just be a
> > >collection of PEAR code.
> >
> > Hmm, good argument. I vote for moving Net_Ping back
> > to pear/ and forgetting the experimental directory.
>
> But please say somewhere that the class is experimental, so users won't
> use it and pear developers can help on improve it. The experimental dir
> is a quite good way of saying this for me.
I think having a major version of 0 should be a pretty clear
indication that a package is experimental or may change completely in
the next release. Maybe we should make this part of the coding
standard?
- Stig
--
Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@fast.no>
Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway