Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Command_Packaging/tests/make-rpm-spec test1.outtest1.phpt test_option_rpm-depname.out test_option_rpm-depname.phpt
test_option_rpm-pkgname.outtest_option_rpm-pkgname.phpt test_option_rpm-release.out test_option_rpm-release.phpt

On Wed, February 15, 2006 8:04 pm, bertrand Gugger said: > I did not understand it was an extra package, no more in pear-core. > So, 1.4.7 dependent as you said yesterday... yes. > In fact, I'm still wondering on so many irrelevant empty dirs in > pear-core, I mean they look as empty, without any "dead files" (Attic) > So it's quite uneasy to see what you replaced from PEAR. I don't think this is anything for me to action? > Dont hear it bloody, but as gave no proposal about it, it could be nice > to know what is no more in pear but in your package. OK, for the benefit of anyone else, I submitted a load of patches/bugs to Greg about (specifically) the "makerpm" command which is currently part of core PEAR. He suggested that we move it to a separate package, PEAR_Command_Packaging, so that has been set up. Essentially it's just got a straightforward fork of the "makerpm" command (only) in it. The plan is that in future methods for other packaging formats (e.g. deb) might be added if there was a demand for it. > Very nice if we get better accepted packaging by distros. Go on ! Side by side with this I am working hard on getting PEAR stuff accepted into Fedora (my particular distro of choice). As a proof-of-concept, PEAR::DB was accepted last week into Fedora Extras. See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176725 I don't subscribe directly to pear-cvs so please cc me or move this to pear-dev for any follow up. Thanks. Tim