Re: Re: HTML_Select

<jon@jellybob.co.uk> wrote : > I don't want this to turn into a flame war... although it appears to already > be doing so. But Bertrand, could you *please* try to tone down your > objections to things you see... expressing your opinion that some code is in > the wrong place/redundant/whatever else is fine... but throwing around > insults such as saying that you thought someones code was a joke is pushing > it... even if you do say "don't take it personally". That wasn't an insult, that was just the way I felt when I saw the announce about a new HTML_Select package being released, and after, when I looked at the actual code. > You wouldn't accept this if you were doing this for a real bricks and mortor > company and being paid for it, so why should anyone who is doing the > development *free of charge* accept it. > > Sorry if I seem a little angry, but I am, since I don't think I've ever seen > you commit a single useful piece of code (feel free to correct me, but I > don't think I have) and yet you seem so happy to shoot down other people's > contributions without a thought. Ok, ok, cool down, man... Now, FYI, I have committed HTML_Table, HTML_QuickForm and a Config package. I have worked on the DB container for the old Config package, the table info for Oracle DB wrapper, some code in LiveUser for config from php arrays, contributions to HTML_Common, HTML_Select, HTML_Template_ITX. Sure, you might not find my contributions useful but others probably do. :) All in all, I was just expressing my opinion but as you noticed, I am not as cold blooded as I would like to be. I'll stop now, do whatever you want with your UK, US county selects. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam