Re: Re: IT[X] fork, round 2

<paj@pearfr.org> wrote : > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:23:48 +0100 > Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com> wrote: > >> <paj@pearfr.org> wrote : >> >>> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 17:02:52 +0300 >>> Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote: >>> >>>> As for changing preg_replace() to str_replace() in variable >>>> substitution: it works faster and fixes an annoying bug, as >>> Bertrand> Mansion pointed out. >>> >>> He pointed something wrong here, that breaks BC, -1 here. >> >> Test it, then we will talk about it. If I "point" something wrong, I >> will admit it. Obviously, that's not the case. > > Will you ever stop being closed ? The bug you have reopened yesterday > points exactly on something that will be broken if you replace preg by a > simple (and faster only under some condition, but this is not a general > state). > > So, that ***BREAKS*** BC. Ah, ok, I get it ! Fixing bugs actually breaks BC. That's cool, thanks for your explanations... Forget it, I am tired. You don't need to reply to this one. TIA. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam