Re: PFC-RFC

Hi, Christian Stocker schrieb:

Some more points (some of them are maybe obvious): - PFCs have to work with error-reporting set to E_ALL. - PFCs have to work with register_globals = off - PFCs have to work on the most widely used platforms ( Windows and all those Unix-derivates (Linux, *BSD, Mac OS X)) only where it's possible and makes sense (NIS/YP on Windows => not possible)

About voting: I don't think, we really need voting for becoming a PF Class, if the criteria are met, it can get the PFC badge. But the question remains, who decides, if the criteria are met. Maybe a little PFC-group (the same as with the signing keys above) could do that. I think these things should be done/available (certifiying procedure):

- Documentation - Tests - Stability - Number of downloads of the package (something like 200 or more? or less?) - Independent review by another developer - Final review by one of the "core" PFC-group members bye, -- ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Michael Bretterklieber - Michael.Bretterklieber@jawa.at JAWA Management Software GmbH - http://www.jawa.at Liebenauer Hauptstr. 200 -------------- privat ------------ A-8041 GRAZ GSM: ++43-(0)676-84 03 15 712 Tel: ++43-(0)316-403274-12 E-mail: michael@bretterklieber.com Fax: ++43-(0)316-403274-10 http://www.bretterklieber.com ------------------------------- ---------------------------------- "...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, June 1972