Re: voting reminder: HTML_Template_Sigma
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Thu, 03 Apr 2003 20:26:04 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: voting reminder: HTML_Template_Sigma | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-14859@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greetings!
Dean Urmson wrote:
+1, both are good packages survival of the fittest applies I think... The one that suits users needs most and is the most actively maintained will become the users favourite and therefore the most popular.Well, I have a feeling that this idea actually *scares* some of the opponents of my package. ;) OK, I now have five +1's and also One +1 and one -1 from Fabien MARTY (that be zero) And one, er, -5 from Richard Heyes (thanks, Richard, I really appreciated that one!) The doc says:
Getting a +1 from a developer means she is in favour of your proposal, while getting a -1 means that the developer doesn't like it. If you finally have five +1's, you can go ahead with step 3.A question to PEAR lawyers: does that passage mean that I can go ahead and release the package or should I wait for more positive votes to "neutralize" the negative ones?