Re: standards etc..

From: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:37:44 +0000
Subject: Re: standards etc..
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1678@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
"Martin Jansen" <mail@martin-jansen.de> wrote in message news:php.pear.dev-1677@news.php.net... > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 18:38:39 +0100, Daniel Andersson wrote: > > >sound quite logical except for the "at the root directory". > >read something here about top-level-directories, like > > > >/ > > HTML/ > > FORM/ > > main.php > > css_extension.php > > TABLE/ > > main.php > > td_span.php > > XML/ > >... > > That's the old standard. The new standard will be > > /HTML_FORM > main.php > css_extension.php > /HTML_TABLE/ > main.php > td_span.php > /XML/ > .. may i ask why you prefer the new one? except for the fact that it's new ;o) this new standard doesn't seem very logic at all. yes, it's nice and everything in the beginning when you only have a few main trees/classes/directories but what happens when you have 200? does that mean that you will have 200 "root directories"? > > >and assumed this was the directory structure that pear was using. > > When Stig Bakken was young and small, he invented PEAR and did not > think much about directory structures. Now he is old and wise and > does not like this structure anymore :-)). > heh.. i think he should stay young and small ;o) > >'cause _IF_ stuff haven't been decided and you are still changing major > >stuff, then i'd love to help (if i can). > > If you want to contribute you are very welcome! Thanks :o) / d

« previous php.pear.dev (#1678) next »