Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR
| From: | (Stig Sæther Bakken) | Date: | Sat, 01 Sep 2001 19:35:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1745@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>]
> Bertrand Mansion wrote:
> >
> > I would like to commit it. Where should I put it ?
> > Here is its composition :
> >
> > Form.php
> > |
> > +- Form directory ---
> > - button.php
> > - checkbox.php
> > - date.php
> > - element.php
> > - file.php
> > - group.php
> > - hidden.php
> > - image.php
> > - input.php
> > - password.php
> > - radio.php
> > - reset.php
> > - select.php
> > - submit.php
> > - text.php
> > - textarea.php
> >
> > and it all depends on Html_Common which is also used by Html_Table.
> > I know it is a bit difficult now with the new directory structure.
> > People understanding this structure could give me a clue. Thanks.
> >
>
> I think we should "open" a subcategory of HTML called Form, and there
> put html forms related things. For your class, for example use:
> HTML/Form/Quick/ and the directory in pear/ module of CVS could be
> HTML_Form_Quick (you know, -Quick- or whatever you want (what about Form
> Builder?)).
>
> So could get:
> require 'HTML/Form/Builder.php';
> $f = new HTML_Form_Builder;
Why not HTML_QForm, HTML_QuickForm or something like that? It's a
replacement for HTML_Form after all, so it shouldn't look like a
"sub-package", which IMHO HTML_Form_Quick would.
- Stig
--
Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com>
Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway