Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR

["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>] > Stig Sæther Bakken wrote: > > > > Why not HTML_QForm, HTML_QuickForm or something like that? It's a > > replacement for HTML_Form after all, so it shouldn't look like a > > "sub-package", which IMHO HTML_Form_Quick would. > > > > Umm.. didn't know it will be a replacement for Form. If it is so, > HTML_Form would be the right choose, to don't break the convention :-? Uhm well, I meant a replacement [for the functionality provided by] HTML_Form. If we want it to replace HTML_Form, it has to be API-compatible etc, which may not be *cough* optimal. - Stig -- Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com> Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway