Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR

From: Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 20:56:12 +0000
Subject: Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1754@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Stig Sæther Bakken wrote: > > ["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>] > > Stig Sæther Bakken wrote: > > > > > > Why not HTML_QForm, HTML_QuickForm or something like that? It's a > > > replacement for HTML_Form after all, so it shouldn't look like a > > > "sub-package", which IMHO HTML_Form_Quick would. > > > > > > > Umm.. didn't know it will be a replacement for Form. If it is so, > > HTML_Form would be the right choose, to don't break the convention :-? > > Uhm well, I meant a replacement [for the functionality provided by] > HTML_Form. If we want it to replace HTML_Form, it has to be > API-compatible etc, which may not be *cough* optimal. > So, if it's different and Ulf is creating his XML forms, why not create this new category? It's just a way to don't have the HTML dir full of form classes. Tomas V.V.Cox

« previous php.pear.dev (#1754) next »