Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Sat, 01 Sep 2001 20:56:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New HTML Form class for PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1754@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
>
> ["Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com>]
> > Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not HTML_QForm, HTML_QuickForm or something like that? It's a
> > > replacement for HTML_Form after all, so it shouldn't look like a
> > > "sub-package", which IMHO HTML_Form_Quick would.
> > >
> >
> > Umm.. didn't know it will be a replacement for Form. If it is so,
> > HTML_Form would be the right choose, to don't break the convention :-?
>
> Uhm well, I meant a replacement [for the functionality provided by]
> HTML_Form. If we want it to replace HTML_Form, it has to be
> API-compatible etc, which may not be *cough* optimal.
>
So, if it's different and Ulf is creating his XML forms, why not create
this new category? It's just a way to don't have the HTML dir full of
form classes.
Tomas V.V.Cox